osamh - Tweet Data Analysis

Summarization

The tweets discuss the issue of delivery apps charging high prices for delivery and sometimes not disclosing that the prices for items may be higher than in-store prices. Additionally, the cost of delivery is often inflated, leading to some people opting to use traditional grocery stores instead. Some users report that prices on the delivery app are the same as in-store prices, but delivery fees can add up. There is concern that delivery apps may control the market if they continue to charge high prices.

Topic Modeling

1. High delivery charges for food delivery apps
2. The difference in prices between menus on the app and the actual restaurant
3. Overpriced delivery charges of various apps, including NaNaNa
4. The convenience of ordering through apps versus going to traditional markets
5. The possibility of monopolization by delivery apps in the future

Emotional Analysis

The emotions expressed in these tweets are mainly frustration and dissatisfaction with the delivery apps' pricing policies. Many users feel that the delivery fee is often excessive, and they criticize the fact that the prices for the same products on the app can be much higher than in physical stores. Some also express skepticism about the authenticity of discounts and sales offered by the apps. However, there are conflicting opinions on whether the convenience of delivery justifies the higher prices, with some users willing to pay extra for the service and others preferring to go to traditional stores. There are also some positive comments, thanking some users for their insights and advice.

Trend Analysis

• Higher delivery fees for restaurant apps
• Price differences between delivery menu and restaurant menu
• Overpriced delivery fees on various apps
• Preference for free delivery from traditional grocery stores over paid delivery from apps
• Discussion on potential market domination by apps that charge only for delivery fees