NesaStefanovic - Tweet Data Analysis

Summarization

The tweets mention the safety of journalists under Minister of Internal Affairs Nebojša Stefanović in 2019, the #Mi333 movement and their opposition to President Aleksandar Vučić and his administration's actions regarding politics and Kosovo. Additionally, there is criticism towards certain politicians such as Ana Brnabić, Siniša Mali and Dinko Gruhonjić. Finally, there is a question regarding the whereabouts of Nebojša Stefanović.

Topic Modeling

1. Journalists safety: tweet 1
2. Political opposition: tweet 2, tweet 3
3. Loss of voter support: tweet 2, tweet 3
4. Kosovo policy: tweet 2, tweet 3
5. Concerns about politician's whereabouts: tweet 4

Emotional Analysis

The tweets express anger and frustration towards politicians, particularly towards Aleksandar Vucic, for their actions and decisions. The mention of Nesa Stefanovic and other politicians in the tweets suggest that they are either being blamed for the current state of affairs or expected to help rectify the situation. Additionally, there is an overall sense of dissatisfaction with the current political climate and a desire for change, as seen in the hashtag #Mi333.

Trend Analysis

1. Criticism of politicians and their actions: Many of the tweets focus on criticizing Serbian politicians, particularly President Aleksandar Vučić, for their decisions and actions surrounding issues such as Kosovo and the loss of voter support.
2. Political alliances and opposition: The hashtag #Mi333 appears in multiple tweets, which refers to a political coalition opposed to the current Serbian government. Other individuals and groups mentioned in tweets also suggest political alliances or opposition.
3. Safety and security: One tweet mentions journalists and their safety, likely referencing concerns about press freedom and potential threats to reporters in Serbia.
4. Government policy: Issues such as Kosovo, election results, and the actions of certain government officials are mentioned in several tweets, suggesting a concern with government policy and decisions.
5. Questions and uncertainty: The final tweet poses a question about the whereabouts of a particular government official, indicating uncertainty or concern about their status or actions.